Skip to main content

Argentine Tango School

History Of Tango – Part 12: El Cachafaz and the Dancers of the Early 20th Century

History Of Tango – Part 12: El Cachafaz and the Dancers of the Early 20th Century

Historic photo of El Cachafaz, an Argentine Tango legend, dancing with Carmencita Calderón. They are captured in an elegant tango pose, showcasing the traditional style of the dance.

We investigate history because we seek to better understand ourselves.

An exceptional individual leaves fragments of footprints, pieces of mirrors that reflect and indicate general aspects of that particular type of individuality.

In this case, the category “tango milonguero dancer” is a classification that allows us to construct our identity. When fortune allows us to glimpse what it was like to be one of them in the past, it enables us to see ourselves not only from a historical perspective, that is, as individuals and classes developing in history, but also, by providing information that helps us to know ourselves better, it offers us examples of values that increase our capacity for choice, making us freer.

El Cachafaz

At ten years old, Ovidio José Bianquet, born February 14, 1885, lived in the Buenos Aires neighborhood of San Cristobal. His father, Antonio Bianquet, had Italianized his surname to make it sound more familiar in a context where 80 percent of surnames were Italian, changing it to Bianchetti.

He rented a house on Rioja Street, near the Gricel dance hall today.

His mother, Petrona Celestina Cabral, was visited by a neighbor accompanied by a police officer, explaining that the child had broken one of her windows with a stone. The mother, incredulous, affirmed that it was impossible, that her son was “good,” but the policeman understood the child’s name as “Benito.” Soon, the father appeared, agreeing with the neighbor, saying that his son was a “scoundrel” (“cachafaz” in Spanish). This led to how our character became known in history: Benito Bianquet, El Cachafaz.

At that time, the child, who had smallpox, which left marks on his face, went to school, worked as a shoeshine boy, and spent the rest of the day on the street, where he occasionally saw men dancing the tango on the sidewalks to the music of street organ grinders. He watched them very attentively when he had the opportunity to be alone at home, as his father worked in a cigarette factory and his mother went out to run errands, he stood in front of the mirror and reproduced what he had observed on the street, recreating and improving the steps he had learned according to his criteria.

One day, while watching those men dance tango, he stood beside them and began dancing, too. The men stopped, and one asked him to dance with him. Everyone was astonished by the skill of this 11-year-old boy, who, from that day on, was recognized throughout the neighborhood for his dancing.

At 18, he left his parental home and moved to Pergamino, where the government incentivized young people who wanted to settle and work there. He lived in Pergamino for a while, working in the fields and making many friends, but he missed his home, his mother, and the tango.

So he soon returned to Buenos Aires and reconnected with his passion, realizing he needed to leave his neighborhood and dance in the “forbidden places” where his art would be better appreciated. Cachafaz’s tango came from his street friends, who were much older than him. Boys his age called him “maestro” and asked him to teach them, to which he responded, “I don’t teach. If you want to learn, watch me and copy.”

At that time, he also began to associate with essential characters in the history of tango, such as Francisco Canaro, with whom he was very close, Carlos Gardel, Discépolo’s father, Ernesto Ponzio, author of the tango “Don Juan,” Rosendo Mendizábal, author of “El entrerriano,” and many more.

Tango was transforming. Born in marginalized neighborhoods, it now sought acceptance from the wealthier classes. This began to happen in the first “waitresses’ cafes” proliferating in the La Boca neighborhood, where patrons could drink coffee and alcoholic beverages, listen to the pioneers of tango music transitioning from the primitive tango of the “Guardia Vieja” to the more elaborate tango of the “Guardia Nueva,” such as Francisco Canaro, Vicente Greco, Genaro Espósito, Roberto Firpo, Arturo Bernstein, and even dance with the waitresses. It was 1903, and El Cachafaz frequented these places, not to dance but to watch.

In those places, the tango dance was also being reworked, recreated day by day. The dancers watched each other and produced their choreographic innovations, inheriting techniques from the past and inspired by the new music.

Pedrín: The Pioneer of Tango and His Influence on El Cachafaz

The most important dancer of that era was Pedrín. Everything about him is conjecture, except that he was one of the pioneering tango dancers. It is speculated that his parents were Spaniards who arrived in the Río de la Plata region between the mid and late 19th century, along with many other European immigrants. The family might have settled in a conventillo near the old Plaza del Comercio, now Plaza Dorrego. There, Pedrín inherited his love for dance and began dancing tango before the age of fifteen.

Pedrín was creative and elegant, with light and swift feet. His friends said that, above all, he knew how not to dance tango. He stood out among the suburban dancers, frequenting street corners and dance venues and developing a unique style with distinctive figures. By 1899, he was considered the most outstanding dancer of his generation. Some called him Pedrín de San Telmo, while others called him Pedrín the One-Eyed. He danced with La Flaca Rosa, but his most significant contribution was his influence on El Cachafaz’s style.

The Unique and Transformative Style of El Cachafaz in Tango

El Cachafaz stood out in improvised dance, creating a style he continuously modified throughout his over 40-year career. He distinguished himself from other street dancers with his elegance, confidence, and precision in posture—qualities that, around 1910, seemed more French than Argentine. Although his technique was not always refined due to his origins in brothels frequented by rough and drunk men, his dance was unique. His figures did not follow a logical structure and often seemed unfinished.

Though smoother than street dancing, he performed “corridas” with an exaggerated sway. The speed and length of his steps varied without apparent reason. At a time when dancers often strayed from the music and took time to regain the rhythm—something unattractive—El Cachafaz was very concerned about the relationship between steps and music, and he had extraordinary musical sensitivity.

His ability to move his feet with great speed and precision allowed him to interpret a musical phrase as if his feet were playing the instruments. He divided the melody and rhythm note by note, synchronizing his foot movements with them. When the bandoneon became the main instrument of tango, he conceived the idea that his movement should represent the instrument’s breathing. The richness of the bandoneon favored his dancing style, softening its rough edges and making his gestures more expressive and poetic.

Watching him dance was a spectacle from the moment he entered the dance halls. His posture, cold blue eyes, olive skin, black hair slicked with gel, and the smallpox scars on his face gave him a severe look that could instill fear when he concentrated intensely. He did not choreograph; he had studied sequences he linked according to his inspiration, often leading him to spontaneously invent figures he would never repeat.

He always danced very upright, which gave him an imposing air. He never stayed completely close to his partner and often did not lead her in a frontal position, making his movements more visible. His partners said they could never figure out what they were doing and never felt forced, sensing the impulse of delicate commands that made them perform the most complex figures with the assurance that El Cachafaz would give them time to complete them.

His style was continuously transforming, noticeable week by week. He danced very differently from the others. In a dance hall, he seemed to come from another era. Women feared being asked to dance by him and, at the same time, desired it because he did many things they were unaware of, but they also knew that, guided by him, there would be no insurmountable difficulties.

The First Triumphs of El Cachafaz and His Rise to International Fame

The first competition El Cachafaz participated in was in Rosario in 1906, at Madame Safó’s house. He had visited a cousin who was making good money with several stores in the city center. His cousin took him to Madame Safó’s, the most expensive brothel in the country, although the dance floor was free. There, the master dancer Gaeta, who trained the girls, mostly of Polish origin, was employed.

When they arrived at the hall, they saw Gaeta dancing with his partner. El Cachafaz asked the first girl who smiled at him to dance, and she followed him very well. He started dancing very close to Gaeta, challenging him with his “cortes and quebradas.” Gaeta did not back down, and soon, Madame Safó organized a competition. They would dance a tango, a waltz, and a milonga. El Cachafaz won the first round, but Gaeta shone more in the waltz. The milonga went to El Cachafaz, securing his victory.

In 1907, he defeated the man considered the best tango dancer in Buenos Aires, Pardo Satillán, who danced with his partner, Parda Esther, both of Uruguayan origin, at the Hansen hall in the Palermo neighborhood. He danced with an unknown young lady, a regular at the place, who confessed to him after the dance that she had thought she was a beginner until then, but with him, she had done steps she did not know she was capable of. She had danced with an ecstatic smile throughout the tense competition.

El Cachafaz was famous for his habit of arriving at any milonga without a partner and establishing his dominance with a regular dancer with whom he had never danced before. This highlights El Cachafaz’s leading qualities and indicates that the average level of dancing at that time was very high.

In 1911, he won another contest and, as a prize, received a contract to work and teach in New York, thus becoming the first officially recognized professional tango dancer.

In 1913, he returned to Buenos Aires, and the owner of the Teatro Olimpo, who had started organizing dances there, proposed that they partner and open a tango school on the upper floor. The venture was so successful that tango ended up displacing the theater, and the name was changed to Salón Olimpo. Within two years, attendance had grown so much that opening a second dance floor in the hall where El Cachafaz taught his classes became necessary. Consequently, the owner began a similar experience in another hall in downtown Buenos Aires. El Cachafaz did not like giving group classes, so he took the opportunity to offer private lessons only.

Rejection and Acceptance of Tango: From Moralistic Criticism to International Acclaim

Meanwhile, a moralistic reaction ensued against tango in the United States and Europe, prompting Pope Pius X to weigh in and accept it. Baron Antonio de Marchi arrived in Buenos Aires in the early 1900s and bridged the social classes of Argentine aristocracy and the lower classes through tango. For him, “Tango had to become the element of unity and solidarity of the city.”

Born in Pallanza, Italy, on August 25, 1875, he died in Buenos Aires on February 20, 1934. He married María Roca, daughter of General Julio Argentino Roca, who was President of Argentina for two terms (1880-1886 and 1898-1904). De Marchi was primarily a sportsman and pioneer. He founded the Sociedad Sportiva, created the Cercle de l’Éppé to promote fencing, encouraged automobile racing, organized the Boy Scouts of Buenos Aires, and formed the school battalions that paraded at the Centennial celebrations (1910). He also promoted horsemanship, cultivated a friendship with Jorge Newbery, and provided the Aero Club with the field of the Sportiva (the current area of the city’s Planetarium), from where the balloon Pampero, piloted by Newbery and Aaron de Anchorena, departed on December 25, 1907.

When World War I broke out, he returned to his country and joined the fighting troops, returning to Argentina after the armistice. In Milan, he had studied tango with Parisian masters. He had the intuition that tango should endure into the future, but for this to happen, the rejection of the upper class had to end.

In 1913, he organized a tango music competition —whose jury was composed of ladies from high society— to promote it to the upper class of Buenos Aires, and hired several dance couples. He asked the participants to moderate their performances to avoid scandalizing the audience, but this provoked harsh criticism in one of Buenos Aires’ leading newspapers, denouncing this tango falsification. This worried De Marchi greatly, and he realized that public opinion agreed with the newspaper article, although they appreciated the Baron’s intention to help tango gain acceptance. Many advised him to abandon the enterprise and cancel the following nights at the theater. But he decided to move forward. He lowered the ticket price, filled the theater, and allowed the dancers to perform freely without explicitly declaring it.

All the dancers began to perform tango figures without censorship. The audience responded positively, even dancing in their seats and trying to imitate the steps they saw. One of the dancers stood out, and from then on, he was mentioned whenever the topic of tango arose in conversation.

He was El Cachafaz, 28 years old.

Gardel and Razzano’s Tribute to El Cachafaz: A Tango Legends Show

In 1918, Gardel and Razzano, the most famous duo in Argentine history, organized a show to honor the world’s best tango dancer, El Cachafaz. This was a year after Carlos Gardel premiered the first tango song and began his career as a tango singer.

The show featured the Firpo-Canaro orchestra, which included the most famous musicians of the time, the same orchestra that had caused a sensation at the Teatro Colón in Rosario during the previous year’s carnivals. It included tango stars such as Eduardo Arolas, Osvaldo Fresedo, Juan D’Ambrogio “Bachicha,” and Pedro Polito on bandoneons; Julio Doutry, Agesilao Ferrazzano, and Tito Roccatagliata on violins; Juan Carlos Bazán on clarinet, Alejandro Michetti on flute, José Martinez on piano, and Leopoldo Thompson on double bass. Francisco Canaro (violin) and Roberto Firpo (piano) alternated in conducting.

The Tango Craze in Paris: 1913

In 1913, Tango was all the rage in Paris. There was a “tango color” (orange), a “tango corset,” and a cocktail: a tablespoon of orange juice, 1/2 measure of gin, 1/4 of dry vermouth, 1/4 of classic vermouth, and 2 dashes of curaçao.

Everyone danced the tango, except the working class, and at all hours: at tango teas from 4 to 7 pm, for 5 francs, including a drink; at champagne tangos; and later at night, in the clubs of the Champs Elysées.

Tango was also danced on the Paris-Deauville train and at the Palais de Glace on skates. There were also competitions dominated by the only Parisian who had learned to dance tango in Buenos Aires, Ludovic de Portalu, Marquis of Senas, a former hussar, 77 years old, who danced with his granddaughter Adry de Carbuccia, 20 years old, dressed in white with a large bow on her head. He was “le roi du tango,” but only for the French because, for the Argentines living in Paris, the king of tango was Bernabé Simarra, nicknamed “El Negro,” or “El Indio.”

Bernabé Simarra: The King of Tango

A black and white portrait of Bernabé Simarra, an Argentine tango dancer and teacher from 1881-1936. He is dressed in a formal suit with a top hat and holds a cane, with his name and

Born on September 18, 1881, in Buenos Aires, Bernabé Simarra is a dancer whose verifiable data is hard to come by. He began his career in 1909 when he won the carnival dance contest in Buenos Aires. He subsequently won first prizes in competitions organized by the Casino and Politeama theaters. From then on, his name became well-known on both sides of the Río de la Plata, and in Montevideo, he won the tournament at the Royal Theatre.

His rising fame as a dancer and teacher, led his student Marie Papillón—a renowned French variety artist—to hire him in 1911 to accompany her to Paris.

His extraordinary choreographic quality and picturesque gaucho attire earned him the nickname “The King of Tango.”

Simarra would perform dressed as a gaucho, carrying a facón, chiripá, and spurs. He reaffirmed his titles by winning dance competitions for professionals at the Femina Theater in 1912 and Folie Magic in 1913, both in Paris. He gave private lessons at Camilo Rhynal’s school to politicians, actors, and aristocrats.

His partner then was the Cuban Ideal Gloria, the most internationally reputed tango dancer.

Tickets sold out on the night of February 25 at Folie Magic. The Argentine audience’s presence was impressive. It was a resounding triumph, and the next day, Paris newspapers dedicated entire pages to him, discussing his life and the fascination of his dance. He met the most important European entrepreneurs at the hotel where he stayed. After considering several proposals, he became a dance teacher at the Hotel Excelsior in Venice, where the most important European aristocrats stayed.

In the early 1920s, he traveled to Barcelona, where he established a dance academy aimed at teaching tango to the Catalan upper class. In time, this specialist in winning dance contests won first prize at the festival for dancers organized by the Principal Palace Theater.

In 1936, when the Spanish Civil War broke out, Simarra had to leave the Iberian Peninsula hastily, leaving all his belongings behind. He traveled to Montevideo, where he was forced to beg and died of grief in the harshest poverty, on the street, on an improvised bed made of newspaper.

In 1913, while Simarra was traveling to Venice, another legend of the Argentine dance arrived in Paris: “El Vasco” Casimiro Aín.

Casimiro Aín: The Dancer Who Took Tango to the World

A black-and-white photograph from the 1928 German movie

Casimiro Aín, known as “El Lecherito,” “El Vasco,” and “El Vasquito,” was born on March 4, 1882, in the La Piedad neighborhood of Buenos Aires, at 81 Callao Avenue, near the corner of Piedad Street (now Bartolomé Mitre). He was the first son of Juan Aín, a French Basque milkman well-known in the area, and Rosa Rataro, a Genoese immigrant.

From a young age, Casimiro showed a natural inclination toward dancing, which he learned to the tune of street organs operated by Italians.

During his youth, he often accompanied his father on milk deliveries, earning him the nicknames “El Lecherito” and “El Vasquito.” Soon, Casimiro’s ease with dancing and passion for tango led him to join, at fourteen, the circus company of the famous clown Frank Brown.

In 1901, seeking new horizons, Casimiro embarked on a cargo ship to Europe. He arrived in England and then traveled to Paris, also visiting Spain.

During his stay in the Old World, he worked various jobs to survive and, along with two friends, began performing in bars and cabarets, gaining notoriety as a tango dancer. His skill and charisma made him the first Argentine dancer to introduce porteño dance internationally.

In 1904, Casimiro returned to Buenos Aires, performing alongside his wife Martina at the Teatro Ópera. During the Centennial of Argentine Independence celebrations in 1910, his performance was a resounding success, establishing him as a professional dancer.

In 1913, with the financial support of Ramón Alberto Lopez Buchardo, a young man from a wealthy family who was one of the introducers of tango in Paris and author of tangos such as “Germaine” and “Entre dos fuegos,” he traveled to France with his partner Jazmín and the typical orchestra of Vicente Loduca, Eduardo Monelos, and Celestino Ferrer, forming the group “La Murga Argentina,” performing at the Cabaret Princesse.

In November 1913, he traveled to New York. A week after his arrival, Aín and his typical orchestra debuted at an invitation-only “Tango Tea” at the Vanderbilt Hotel, organized by Mrs. E. Roscoe Matthews, whom some publications credit with bringing Aín to New York.

El Vasco performed several exhibition dances and instructed participants in the ‘authentic’ Argentine tango. “Everyone who danced with Mr. Aín later declared that he was wonderful,” an observer stated.

In addition to his roles as a teacher, Aín soon found work as an exhibition dancer. Sometimes, he presented himself as ‘Casimiro Aín,’ other times as ‘Casimir Aín,’ and even as ‘Professor Argentino,’ proclaiming himself the ‘inventor of tango,’ a clear exaggeration, but less so than other claimants to the title.

Though the authenticity of the experience was highlighted, decency was also emphasized. Both Parisians and New Yorkers wanted a tango that was authentic enough to be exotic but not so sensual as scandalous. The version Aín performed reflected this paradox; it was described as “authentic” and at the same time “as majestic and formal as the old minuet.”

Tango instruction manuals, which proliferated in New York in 1914, spoke of a “new tango” purified of unpleasant elements and its undeniable Afro-American origins, making it suitable for American and European clientele. Here, we see that the idea of a “new tango” is not new, originating largely not from an alleged “evolution” of tango but from marketing needs. Like today’s professionals, Casimiro’s priority was a dance that was easy to teach, attractive to watch, and fundamentally profitable.

In 1920, Casimiro Aín returned to Paris with Jazmín to win the World Championship of Modern Dances on June 16, competing against 150 couples at the Marigny Theater.

At that time, bandoneonists Manuel Pizarro and “El Tano” Genaro Expósito were forming an orchestra to perform at the Princesse. Pizarro offered El Vasco to join the project, but he was too busy with private lessons.

His fame continued to grow, and later, he toured Europe and Egypt with the German Edith Peggy, with whom he can be seen dancing in the German film “Abwege.”

In 1926, he danced at the Club Mirador with Francisco Canaro’s orchestra in New York.

In 1930, he returned permanently to Argentina, where he continued performing and teaching dance for a few more years. His performance in the 1936 show “The Evolution of Tango” is notable from this period, directed by Francisco De Caro at the Teatro Ópera in Buenos Aires.

An unconfirmed legend, recounted by Aín himself, says that on February 1, 1924, he danced the tango “Ave María” by Francisco Canaro before Pope Pius XI in the Vatican, accompanied by the librarian of the Argentine embassy, a young woman named Scotto. However, later investigations found no evidence of this event in the Vatican archives.

Throughout his career, Casimiro Aín was described as a charming, bold, bohemian, and persistent man. He taught numerous people to dance and earned a considerable fortune thanks to his talent and dedication. He passed away on October 17, 1940, after having a leg amputated due to gangrene.

Casimiro Aín left an indelible legacy in the world of tango. He was one of the pioneers in bringing this dance to the international stage and significantly contributed to its popularization in Europe and America. His life and work are remembered and celebrated by tango lovers worldwide.

Rodolfo Valentino: The Icon of Tango and the Golden Age of Hollywood

On October 18, 1920, the Princess Cabaret reopened under the financing of entrepreneur Elio Volterra and the direction of Manuel Pizarro. Thanks to the publicity Volterra made in the Parisian newspapers, the entire Argentine community residing in Paris attended the opening, as well as personalities such as Mistinguett, the French vedette, actress, and singer who was once the highest-paid female artist in the world; boxer, actor, and World War I hero Georges Carpentier; and Maurice Chevalier, an emblematic figure of French culture.

On the second night, Celestino Ferrer recounts, “I see a young man sitting at one of the tables who looks familiar. It’s the actor Rodolfo Valentino. I had met him in New York in 1915 as Rodolfo Guglielmi, an Italian boy working as a bricklayer, and with whom I shared a room with three bunk beds in a private house.”

A black-and-white photograph of Rudolph Valentino and Natacha Rambova dancing the tango during their 1923 dance tour. Valentino is dressed in an Argentine gaucho outfit, while Rambova wears a flowing dress, both captured mid-dance with a poised and graceful stance.

Rodolfo Valentino, born Rodolfo Pietro Filiberto Raffaello Guglielmi on May 6, 1895, in Castellaneta, Italy, was a legendary silent film actor and an iconic figure of the 1920s. His foray into dance began when he emigrated to the United States in 1913.

Valentino might have seen Casimiro Aín and his dance partner, Jasmine, performing at the Princess Cabaret in Paris. It is plausible that he even met Aín, as many Argentinians shared their Italian heritage and language, making such encounters possible.

Popular history attributes the exodus of Argentinians from Paris to New York to the outbreak of World War I, a cataclysm that, as described in Vicente Blasco Ibáñez’s “The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse,” halted the French tango fever. However, departures had already begun before the war due to an excess of Argentine expatriates in Paris. It was rumored that tango was about to triumph in New York. Aín and his company were among the first to cross the ocean, arriving on November 15, 1913.

Valentino quickly made a name for himself as a talented and charismatic dancer in New York.

Likely, Valentino and Aín often met in New York, as they frequented the same places and had many mutual friends. According to Celestino Ferrer, Aín and his orchestra stayed in the same place as Valentino, though Aín recalls that Valentino only visited them often.

In 1917, Valentino traveled from New York to the United States West Coast, working in various theatrical productions that he had been touring until he was convinced he should become a film actor. He arrived in Hollywood, where he initially worked as a dancer and social dance instructor, acquiring a clientele of older women from whom he borrowed their luxury cars. Once he secured his livelihood in this way, he began actively seeking screen roles.

His role in the 1921 film “The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse” showcased his dance talents to a broader audience.

Valentino performed the tango gracefully and enthusiastically in a memorable scene, which sparked a tango craze across the United States and solidified his status as a dance icon.

In 1922, due to financial disagreements, Valentino declared an “individual strike” against his current studio, Famous Players. During that time, he met George Ullman, who soon became his manager. Ullman, with experience at the Mineralava Beauty Clay Company, convinced the company that Valentino, with his vast group of admirers, would be an ideal spokesperson, what we know today as an “influencer.”

On January 25, 1923, New York newspapers announced that Valentino and his wife, Natacha Rambova, would embark on a dance exhibition tour across the United States and Canada, covering 88 cities. Traveling in a luxurious Pullman car, they performed in numerous venues, though some audiences felt the shows were too brief. Valentino also served as a judge in beauty contests sponsored by Mineralava, one of which was filmed and titled “Rudolph Valentino and his 88 Beauties.”

Valentino’s dedication to dance extended beyond the screen. He was known for practicing rigorously, constantly refining his technique, and expanding his repertoire. His influence on dance culture during the 1920s was profound, inspiring many to learn tango and ballroom dancing.

Tragically, Valentino’s life was cut short when he died at 31 in 1926. However, his legacy as a dancer endures. He is remembered for popularizing tango and for the passion he brought to his performances.

Thanks to his extraordinary talent, Rodolfo Valentino remains a symbol of Hollywood’s Golden Age, an era when dance and film intertwined perfectly.

That night in 1920 at the Princess Cabaret, Manuel Pizarro also saw him and spotlighted him with a lamp. He approached and asked him to dance a tango, to which Valentino agreed, dancing “El Choclo” with a beautiful partner. Technically, he was not very good from an Argentine perspective, but he was elegant and very pleasing to the audience.

Pizarro was astonished by the audience’s enthusiasm for a dance couple and made one last attempt to convince El Vasco, but he was too busy with his private lessons.

El Cachafaz Arrives in Paris: Triumph and Nostalgia

Since El Vasco Aín could not join Manuel Pizarro’s show, Pizarro decided to bring El Cachafaz to Paris. It was December 1920, and the Cabaret Princesse, which Argentine entrepreneur Elio Volterra had acquired, changed its name to “El Garrón.” This term from lunfardo slang, originating in brothels, refers to a favor a woman does for a charming client, possibly out of love. Vicente Madero, another of the “Niños bien” (wealthy young men) promoting tango in Paris, proposed the name.

Another version suggests that the name change was due to a remark by Celestino Ferrer, who said, “Volterra thinks that when his cabaret is full of Argentines, he will be spared from those ‘garroneros’ Frenchmen,” referring to stingy, miserly individuals who don’t spend money. After learning that word’s meaning, Volterra transformed Princesse into “El Garrón.”

“El Garrón” gathered the wealthy Argentine community residing in Paris. Since its renaming, every night at 5 AM, the waiters served “puchero a la criolla,” a typical Argentine dish.

On those December nights in 1920, El Cachafaz arrived to dance at El Garrón for the first time. Manuel Pizarro introduced him along with his partner, Emma Bóveda. Many Argentines in the audience had already seen him in Buenos Aires, but it was something new for the French. Paris had never seen a tango dance like this, with a dancer who didn’t smile, seemed sullen, with exaggerated twists and unpredictable stops, yet caressed the floor delicately and elegantly, performing intricate figures that left the audience breathless.

The next day, the first requests for lessons came in, but El Cachafaz did not want to teach, as he had planned this trip only for performances. People were insistent, and the requests multiplied daily until El Cachafaz finally agreed. He had so many private lessons that he couldn’t keep up, so he decided to hold a group class at El Garrón every night before the show opened. He earned a lot of money but spent it all and didn’t feel comfortable in Paris. He couldn’t form a good relationship with the French or Argentines living in Paris. After a month, he returned to Buenos Aires empty-handed.

Back in Buenos Aires: El Cachafaz and His Tango Academy

During the 1920s, El Cachafaz worked for a group of aristocrats who hired him with an extraordinary salary to give private lessons to the members of an exclusive club for eight hours a day. However, he preferred to give private lessons at clients’ homes, a method that El Vasco Aín would also use.

After several years of this experience, El Cachafaz opened his academy in 1930 on Lavalle Street, between Rodriguez Peña and Callao. There, he had the assistance of Carmencita Calderón for his teaching.

El Cachafaz in Cinema: From Silent to Sound

Ovidio José Bianquet appeared in 14 films. The first was “Resaca,” in 1916, during the silent film era when much of the public first became acquainted with El Cachafaz.

In 1933, he appeared dancing “El entrerriano,” played by Ernesto Ponzio and Juan Carlos Bazán, alongside Carmencita Calderón in “Tango,” the first sound film in the history of Argentine cinema.

The last film he appears in is “Carnaval de antaño,” from 1940, dancing with Sofía Bozán.

In 1941, he participated in the theatrical show “La Historia del Tango” by Francisco Canaro and Ivo Pelay, which premiered in Buenos Aires at the Teatro Nacional with great success.

What Was El Cachafaz Like? The Man Behind the Tango Legend

Without fear of exaggeration, it can be said that “El Cachafaz” was the most outstanding and complete tango dancer of his time. He never had a dance teacher; his intuition was his best guide in developing his style. He was impeccable in his bearing, elegant and precise in his movements, and had the best musicality. His talent was fundamental in spreading tango worldwide and promoting its growth in Argentina. He was as popular among aristocrats as in poor neighborhoods and had friends of all kinds—millionaires, criminals, police officers, politicians, entertainers, and intellectuals.

His character was complex. He was generous and indifferent to money, spending everything he earned. He made a lot of money but often didn’t have a penny. He was fond of fleeting pleasures: expensive hotels, good restaurants, clothes, champagne, and costly gifts for his women (though not for his dance partners). Perhaps this had something to do with the training of a milonguero dancer, for whom the present moment is always the crucial one, where one’s entire life is at stake, like in a deadly duel, reminiscent of Jorge Luis Borges‘ compadritos, such as Jacinto Chiclana. Perhaps in tango dancing, one still finds the spirit of these compadritos, heirs to the gaucho, who in turn was an heir to the medieval knight, and this spirit comes alive in us when we dance tango, just as when reading an author, the spirit of that author engages with us and transforms us. His chaotic life contrasted with the precision of his dance movements and his licentious habits with the almost military discipline in his profession.

When in Buenos Aires, he would go to Café El Estaño on Corrientes Street daily. He had a fixed table there, met with friends, and conducted business meetings. He called it his “office.”

He was earnest. Carmencita Calderón recounts that his laugh was barely a breath. He could be very irritable but also very tender.

Two years before his death, at 55, he married his 18-year-old niece, Edelmira Bianquet, daughter of one of his sisters. He had a daughter with another woman whom he adored but never officially recognized.

Carmencita Calderón: The Dance Partner of El Cachafaz and Her Passion for Tango

A black-and-white photograph of the famous tango dancers El Cachafaz and Carmencita Calderón. They are posed in a dance position, with El Cachafaz wearing a suit and Carmencita in a flowing dress, both appearing focused and intense.

She was the dance partner of El Cachafaz from 1933 until his death on February 7, 1942. Born on February 10, 1905, she lived for over 100 years until October 31, 2005. She was a school teacher, but dance had fascinated her since childhood. She learned to dance tango at the dances her brother organized on Sunday afternoons at the family home’s patio in the Villa Urquiza neighborhood. Her parents were passionate about tango, and when they saw her dance, they would correct her, especially regarding her posture.

At night, in the now-empty patio, she practiced alone, imagining embellishments for the steps she had followed during the afternoon, and she used a chair to perfect her turns.

She never conceived the idea of becoming a professional dancer, something her parents would never accept, but she taught her younger sisters to dance, her friends, and later, her friends’ friends.

When her mother died young, she cared for her younger sisters, whom she eventually began accompanying to dances at the Club Sin Rumbo, a short distance from her home.

She did not go to dance. The custom of the time required that young girls attend dances with their mothers or a family member. Unexpectedly, one day, with great insistence, one of the most famous dancers in Buenos Aires, Giuseppe Giambuzzi, nicknamed El Tarila, asked her to dance.

El Tarila: A Tango Protagonist

Born in Italy in 1889, he arrived in Buenos Aires with his parents at the age of 6, escaping the frequent earthquakes that affected their hometown. He had blue eyes and a prominent nose. Around 1910, he worked cleaning the hall where the dancers Gallito, Nando, and Romolo taught classes. He watched the classes and copied the movements, practicing with two broomsticks, and then the teachers would correct him.

Gradually, he became passionate about dancing, dancing with a hat on the sidewalks with other men at night, and over the years, he became a prominent figure in tango.

He became the director of an important popular dance academy owned by Domingo Santa Cruz, the author of the tango “Unión Cívica.” At the academy, patrons paid 10 cents per dance to dance with one of the 35 employed dancers.

He met El Cachafaz in 1915 and became friends. He was a professional bricklayer, a job he never left, even during his most successful moments. He was the most famous dancer after Casimiro Aín and El Cachafaz. Although his appearance was not striking, his technique and skills set him apart, demonstrating exceptional prowess.

When he danced with Carmencita Calderón at the Club Sin Rumbo, he proposed that she become his and El Cachafaz’s dance partner, as they were both without partners then.

Carmencita and El Cachafaz: The Legendary Tango Couple

Carmencita Calderón would not have accepted to dance with El Tarila, but she did want to dance with El Cachafaz, although she was also terrified. Her life changed completely. From being a school teacher and volunteer nurse, she became the dance partner of the best tango dancer of the time.

They debuted with Pedro Maffia‘s orchestra at the Teatro de San Fernando in 1933.

Carmencita’s arrival intensified their rivalry, and they soon dissolved their association. From then on, Carmencita primarily danced with El Cachafaz.

Regarding her style, she tells us the following in an interview conducted by Patricia Ramirez and Alberto García in 1995.

  • Alberto García: What was the dance style like at that time?
  • Carmencita Calderón: It was tango! Because now they don’t dance tango. What they do is fictitious… if back in my time I danced like they do today, with a slit on the side showing my legs, the audience in the theater would jump on stage, rob me, and send me where I belonged. The entertainment places for men, right? Well, that’s it. No! The work has to be done from the hips down, and that’s it. I dance because a woman has the obligation to adorn. So I adorn, it’s my thing, I adorn, and that’s what a woman has to do. But now, the women are the ones who move their legs. The man has to move his legs and do the cuts! Because there are only two types of tango, the salon tango and the tango with cuts, which many call orillero or canyengue. I danced with the two greatest dancers, Don Benito and Tarila. Tarila was the Italian, shorter than El Cachafaz. Now, the Italians are compadritos. There’s a version of the history of tango that says that when tango started being danced, it was danced by the sons of Italians, the compadritos. And so they would stoop down. Not El Cachafaz. El Cachafaz moved from the hips down, and that was it. The body upright. And he did those measured cuts, just right, it was something beautiful. I, lively, would move my little legs, adorning it. I adorn. And that’s what a woman has to do. But today, all a woman does is lift her leg. I am the creator of the slit. But not the slit that is used here, all the way up.

Originating from the popular school, in neighborhood salons and clubs, his body language was inimitable, full of feeling, and a strange simplicity that is not taught in academies.

She was neither the woman nor the lover of the legendary Cachafaz, who always addressed her formally. She never rehearsed a choreography! She always knew that letting herself be led by a man on the dance floor or stage was not submitting or subordinating to the male, but accepting his guidance to be able to dance. And so, in a trance, listening to the music, sometimes ignoring the boastful behavior of some men, she improvised complex figures and movements with them that inspired admiration. 

Carmencita conveyed that tango was whistled and hummed in the streets and that her mother sang while washing clothes. That tango walked on the Buenos Aires dance floors without spectacular movements but with a unique and untransferable embrace, sliding the sole across the floor.

She danced with El Cachafaz until their last performance together, in 1942, in Mar del Plata. After dancing “Don Juan” backstage, El Cachafaz—almost 57 years old—collapsed and died from a heart attack.

Conclusion: The Pioneers of Tango and Their Legacy in Dance

This article has attempted to explore the lives and legacies of El Cachafaz and other iconic dancers of the early 20th century, highlighting their influence on tango. From his humble beginnings in Buenos Aires to his acclaim on international stages, El Cachafaz, known for his unique and elegant style, defined an era in tango. Pedrín, Bernabé Simarra, Casimiro Aín, and Carmencita Calderón, each with their own stories and contributions, enriched and transformed tango, taking it beyond Argentine borders. El Cachafaz’s arrival in Paris, his triumphant return to Buenos Aires, and his foray into cinema, along with the memories of his contemporaries, allow us to better understand our identity as dancers and lovers of tango. There were other dancers, but these can be considered the most representative.

References:

“El Cachafaz. Nació, vivió y murió por el tango (Voces de la milonga número 2)” por Massimo Di Marco, edición digital, Milano 2016.
“Cuando al Paraíso lo llamaban Madame Safó”, Diario La Capital, 13 de abril de 2008, https://www.barriopichincha.com.ar/cuando-al-paraiso-lo-llamaban-madame-safo/
“¿Un Barón y un Papa en la elevación social del tango?” por José Gobello y Néstor Pinsón, https://www.todotango.com/historias/cronica/417/Un-Baron-y-un-Papa-en-la-elevacion-social-del-tango/
“Pizarro – Los recuerdos de París y Europa” Por Oscar Zucchi, https://www.todotango.com/historias/cronica/231/Pizarro-Los-recuerdos-de-Paris-y-Europa/
“Vicente Madero” por José Gobello y Néstor Pinsón,  https://www.todotango.com/creadores/biografia/1605/Vicente-Madero/
“Bernabé Simarra” por Néstor Pinsón, https://www.todotango.com/creadores/biografia/172/Bernabe-Simarra/
El Vasco Casimiro Aín, Campeón Mundial de Bailes Modernos” por Javier Barriero, https://javierbarreiro.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/el-vasco-ain-campeon-mundial-de-bailes-modernos/
“Reto de bailarines” por Francisco García Jiménez, https://www.todotango.com/historias/cronica/74/Reto-de-bailarines/
“Who taught Valentino to tango?” por Camille Scaysbrook, https://brooksieatthemovies.weebly.com/who-taught-valentino-to-tango.html
“El Cachafaz en Estados Unidos” por Enrique Binda, https://www.todotango.com/historias/cronica/466/El-Cachafaz-en-Estados-Unidos/
“Pedrín de San Telmo” por Gustavo Benzecry Sabá, https://www.todotango.com/creadores/biografia/1789/Pedrin-de-San-Telmo/
“El tango en el cine mudo” por Jorge Miguel Couselo, https://www.todotango.com/historias/cronica/474/El-tango-en-el-cine-mudo/
“Escuela del Tango: Una publicación singular” por Juan Manuel Peña, https://www.todotango.com/historias/cronica/542/Escuela-del-Tango:-Una-publicacion-singular/
Carmencita Calderón bailando en 1970 https://youtu.be/Z219e03AmWg?si=9b6MyrDncecn30Gw
Carmencita Calderón habla de los estilos de tango y del rol de la mujer https://youtu.be/JmzZs0X1XaY?si=z5uTbx_P6JY569dj
“Carmencita Calderón” por José María Otero https://www.todotango.com/creadores/biografia/800/Carmencita-Calderon/

Learn the Rich History of Tango

Discover More Argentine Tango Articles:

Leer este artículo en español

Continue reading

Exploring the Soul of Tango: Lyrics and Dance in the Dance of Passion

Exploring the Soul of Tango: Lyrics and Dance in the Dance of Passion

Marcelo Solis and his brother Carlos enjoying breakfast at an outdoor café in Buenos Aires. Marcelo, on the left, captures the moment with a selfie, featuring his light brown hair and a slight smile. Carlos, on the right, appears cheerful with white hair, enjoying the morning. Their table hosts a delightful breakfast setup with a teapot, coffee, and a visually appealing avocado toast topped with sprouts and cherry tomatoes. The scene portrays a warm, casual family moment.

This article marks the beginning of a series on the lyrics of Tango.

I wish to dedicate it to my brother, Carlos Daniel Solís, who recently passed away on April 28, 2024, at the age of 56. May he rest in peace.

Initially, it is crucial to discuss whether understanding the lyrics of Tango is necessary to dance it properly.

Enrique Santos Discépolo, Argentine Tango composer and author.

It’s important to note that Tango composers have always made a great effort to fuse the lyrics with the melody adequately. A clear example is Enrique Santos Discépolo, known for his meticulousness and who could spend years perfecting a single Tango.

Therefore, we can conclude that the music of Tango aims to resonate with the emotions already expressed in its lyrics and vice versa.

This indicates that understanding every word is not indispensable to feeling its emotional impact. When dancing a tango, we generally do not focus on the lyrics, as it is complicated to pay attention to both the poetry and the technical and emotional elements of the dance simultaneously.

Therefore, if our interest is to delve deeper into the poetry of lyrics, the ideal would be to listen to the tango without dancing. However, knowing the lyrics of a tango before dancing can significantly enrich the interpretation of the dance, not only for that particular tango but also by contributing to our understanding of Tango as a way to appreciate human life, estimating our existence from the assessments of the personalities who lived and were an integral part of this phenomenon called Tango, which had its peak in the 1940s in the Rio de la Plata.

Tango lyrics often reflect the repercussions of pursuing our most extreme desires, warning us about the possible consequences of this exuberant enterprise. From an involved yet distant perspective, like that of a milonga DJ from his booth, they juxtapose feelings of nostalgia and sadness with the lively excitement experienced on the dance floor. These lyrics also explore the belief in a kind of collective fiction, where a community is presumed in which we value each other. This ideal attracts us partly because we fear loneliness. Through Tango, it is possible to perceive the essences and personalities of the dancers simply by observing their movements and bodies in the dance.

Dancing Tango is also an act of pride and mastery. It is not a dance for the shy or guilty; it is not for those who wish to hide. Whoever dances Tango does not necessarily seek to be the center of attention but understands that a good dance will inevitably attract looks. This phenomenon is seen not as a quest for validation but as a gift, an offering of beauty to those spectators who know how to appreciate it without envy or resentment.

It is useful to explore the lyrics that refer to the Tango itself and its dance to deepen one’s understanding of it.

Interpretation of the tango “Que me quiten lo bailao”

Lyrics and music by Miguel Bucino, 1942, in the version of Ricardo Tanturi and his Orquesta Típica, sung by Alberto Castillo, recorded in 1943.

Listen “Que me quiten lo bailao”

“Open hand with men, and upright in any ordeal,
I have two fierce passions: the felt and the liquor…
Dancer from a good school, there is no milonga where I’m surplus,
sometimes I am poor and other times I am a lord.
What do you want me to do, brother? It’s a gift of fate!
The urge to save money has never been my virtue!
The bubbles and women’s eyes electrify me
from those sweet days of my joyful youth!

But I do not regret
those beautiful moments
that I squandered in life.
I had everything I wanted…
and even what I did not want,
the fact is that I enjoyed it.
My conduct was serene,
I was generous in good times
and in bad times, I shrank.
I was a magnate and a vagabond
and today I know the world so well
that I prefer to be this way.

What do you want me to do, brother! I was born to die poor,
with a tango between my lips and in a muddled game of cards.
I play, sing, drink, laugh… and even if I don’t have a penny left,
when the last hour strikes… let them take away what I danced!”

“Que me quiten lo bailao” is a popular phrase in Spanish that expresses the satisfaction of enjoying lived experiences, regardless of future consequences. The lyrics and music of this piece, created by Miguel Bucino, encapsulate this philosophy of life through the lens of Tango.

The lyrics could be interpreted as a celebration of the freedom and pleasure found in Tango dancing, suggesting that once lived, these experiences are inalienable, a personal treasure that cannot be taken away by external circumstances or the passage of time. In the context of Tango, this expression takes on a nuance of defiance and detachment, characteristics resonant with the genre’s emotionally intense and often melancholic nature.

Tango is an artistic expression that allows dancers and listeners to connect with deep emotions, and “Que me quiten lo bailao” serves as an anthem to live fully and without regrets. It reflects a joyful acceptance of all that life has to offer despite its inevitable ups and downs.

A classic image of Miguel Bucino and Tita Merello dancing tango in a scene from the movie

Miguel Bucino, born on August 14, 1905, in San Cristóbal, Buenos Aires, began his musical career playing the bandoneón. At 17, he briefly joined Francisco Canaro’s orchestra in 1923, which dismissed him for being a poor musician and encouraged him to pursue dancing, a vocation for which he showed natural talent. Bucino made his professional debut at the Teatro Maipo in 1925, and his career as a dancer quickly took off. He traveled with Julio De Caro to Brazil in 1927 and toured Argentina with the show “Su Majestad El Tango.” He pioneered dancing Tango at the Teatro Colón in 1929 and continued his career in Europe in 1931, performing in cities like Madrid and Paris. He participated in several theatrical seasons with figures such as Francisco Canaro and Ivo Pelay, teaching Tango to royalty and Hollywood celebrities such as the princes Humberto of Savoy and Edward of Windsor and actors Ramón Novarro and Jorge Negrete.

Although initially unsuccessful as a musician, Bucino excelled as a Tango composer, registering between 60 and 70 works, including hits like “Bailarín compadrito” and “Que me quiten lo bailao”.

Bucino retired in 1942 and died in Buenos Aires on December 15, 1973, leaving a lasting legacy in the world of Tango as a dancer, lyricist, and composer.

Here we could see him dance a tango with the celebrated actress and singer Tita Merello in the film “Noches de Buenos Aires”:

Listening to a tango means interpreting it in a personal way. Tango is felt from within. Our inner selves, with all our experiences, emotions, repressions, and more, listen to that tango, that lyric with music, and recreate it in many ways. Some interpretations become habitual and thus are maintained, becoming like translations of what is said for everyone in what we believe we hear.

Following this idea, which I believe is shared by those who love Tango, I propose a way to understand this tango, although I clarify that I do not seek to be objective or definitive.

This is what my life, my dance, hears in this tango:

The first verse, “Open hand with men, and upright in any order,” suggests a vision of masculinity based on integrity and fairness. The phrase” “open hand” can be interpreted as a symbol of generosity and transparency in relationships with other men, indicating a willingness to treat others justly and without secrecy. On the other hand “upright in any ordeal” highlights the importance of maintaining honorable conduct, regardless of the circumstances. Together, these expressions advocate for masculinity that relies on mutual trust and respect for codes of conduct that ensure equality and dignity among people without resorting to excuses based on external factors such as social position, economy, or biological or psychological conditions. In essence, it proposes an ideal of masculinity that values and promotes nobility in dealing with others, emphasizing personal responsibility over deterministic influences.

The second verse, “I have two fierce passions: the felt and the liquor” clearly illustrates the intensity and commitment with which the character lives his emotions: the cosmic chance against which we pit our will, trying to divert its course to fulfill our desires, using vital enthusiasm as a way to gauge our existence. This line highlights how the character faces that chance and uncertainty of human existence, not with fear or caution, but with an iron will to tilt events in his favor and satisfy his deep desires. The “vital enthusiasm” mentioned becomes his bulwark against mundanity and monotony, using his zest for life to measure and affirm his existence. In this context, the verse not only reflects a statement of affirmation of an orderly life from the ethical and aesthetic value of emotions but also a life philosophy that fully embraces uncertainty and enthusiasm as essential elements of human experience.

The third verse, “Dancer from a good school, there is no milonga where I’m surplus,” speaks to the technical mastery acquired through study and guided practice and reflects the respect and admiration the dancer generates within the Tango community. Essentially, the verse celebrates the achievement of excellence and elegance in dancing, which is only possible through the choice of good mentors and an unwavering commitment to continuous learning. The act of dancing and the milonga are used metaphorically to talk about life in general and how we conduct ourselves in it. Here, “dance” symbolizes how we move and react to the different rhythms and challenges that life presents us. Being a “dancer from a good school” implies having learned and mastered the skills needed to navigate these challenges with grace and competence through individual effort and determination and by choosing “good school”, that is, good guides. The “milonga”, a place where Tango is danced, represents the various situations and environments we encounter in life. Saying “There is no milonga where I’m surplus” suggests that the dancer, thanks to his preparation and skill, can adapt and excel in any context or situation that life presents, never being redundant or inadequate, but always being a valuable addition. This metaphor extends the idea that, just like a Tango dancer trained in a good school, a person who is well-prepared by their experiences and education can effectively face any life circumstance. Achievements and recognition of the dancer parallel the successes that a person can achieve in their personal and professional life when they are well-prepared and can adapt fluidly to different situations, showing that preparation, continuous learning, and adaptability are crucial to success in life, just as they are in dance.

The fourth verse, “sometimes I am poor and other times I am a lod,” reflects the acceptance of the fluctuations of fortune throughout life, recognizing how circumstances can shift between extremes of wealth and poverty. This phrase encapsulates the fact that we cannot always control the external factors that affect our economic and social position. This acceptance is not focused solely on economic reality but on a life philosophy that values other riches that are not material. The phrase indicates that the individual does not measure their worth or success solely through material wealth (“I am poor”) nor allows moments of abundance to define their identity completely (“I am a lord”). Instead, the person adapts and values life and experiences beyond material wealth. Thus, the verse suggests a balanced and mature approach to life, gracefully taking adversity and prosperity, emphasizing the importance of resilience and maintaining dignity and self-respect regardless of economic circumstances. This perspective can be compelling in contexts like Tango, where art and personal expression are often valued more than material wealth.

The fifth verse, “What do you want me to do, brother’s a gift of fate!” expresses an attitude of acceptance toward life’s circumstances beyond our control, viewing them as part of a predetermined destiny or luck that befalls us. This approach reflects a life philosophy that accepts the highs and lows with serenity and gratitude, recognizing that what happens to us, positive or negative, can be seen as a “gift of fate”. This perspective invites us to embrace life as it comes, not resisting the events but receiving them with joy and optimism. By considering events as gifts, it emphasizes the idea that every experience has inherent value, regardless of its apparent nature. This attitude fosters a sense of inner peace and satisfaction and enables facing challenges with greater strength and maintaining a cheerful disposition towards uncertainty.

In summary, this verse distills the essence of living with joyful acceptance and a calm faith that, in some way, what life brings has its purpose and value, teaching us to cherish every moment as an unexpected and often undeserved gift but always meaningful.

These discussions and analyses of Tango lyrics offer a deeper insight into how the dance and its music can serve as a profound commentary on life, personal philosophy, and social interactions, providing not just entertainment but also lessons and reflections that resonate with the emotional and philosophical depths of those who engage with it deeply. The reflections within Tango lyrics like those of “Que me quiten lo bailao” extend beyond the dance floor, weaving into the fabric of life a philosophy that values experience over material gain, personal authenticity over societal expectations, and emotional expression over restrained conformity. This resonates deeply with the Tango community and beyond, illustrating the universal themes of life’s fleeting nature, the richness of lived experiences, and the celebration of the human spirit in the face of life’s uncertainties.

Continuing with the exploration of the lyrics, the verses “But I do not regret / those beautiful moments / that I squandered in life. / I had everything I wanted… / and even what I did not want; / the fact is that I enjoyed it.”

These lines express a profound acceptance and appreciation for life’s experiences, even those that might be seen from a conservative or materialistic perspective as wasteful. This attitude rejects the notion that time should always be spent productively in an economic sense and instead celebrates the intrinsic value of experiences for the wisdom they impart.

This perspective acknowledges that life should not be judged solely by tangible, cumulative outcomes, like money or possessions, but also by moments of happiness and personal fulfillment, regardless of their “economic utility”. By stating that he does not regret those “squandered moments”, the speaker fully embraces his past and the decisions he made, viewing them as essential to his narrative and growth.

This stance also suggests generosity towards oneself and life, a willingness to live fully and unreservedly, and the recognition that each experience, however transient, enriches our being and contributes to the fullness of our existence. By freeing oneself from the pressure to justify every moment of life regarding material gain, the speaker invites us to value life for the quality of its experiences and the emotions it evokes.

“My conduct was serene, / I was generous in good times / and in bad times, I shrank.”

These lines reflect a conscious and balanced approach to the various situations of life. Here, the speaker presents himself as someone who maintains calm and serenity (“My conduct was serene”), suggesting a thoughtful and mature way of handling both times of abundance and adversity.

Being “generous in good times” indicates a willingness to share freely his resources and joys with others. This generosity is material and emotional, reflecting an openness to enjoy and share the good times fully.

On the other hand, “in bad times, I shrank,” which demonstrates a prudent and modest attitude during difficult periods. This phrase can be interpreted as reducing ostentation or expenditure, a restraint in behavior to better cope with times of scarcity or challenge. It does not necessarily imply surrendering or withdrawing completely but rather a wise adaptation to less favorable circumstances.

Together, these verses encapsulate the wisdom of living according to the circumstances, knowing when to extend oneself and when to conserve resources. The speaker understands his capacities and limitations and acts in a way that maintains a sustainable balance throughout his life. This demonstrates a life philosophy that balances generosity and caution, allowing the individual to navigate life’s highs and lows with grace and dignity.

The final lines are: “What do you want me to do, brother? I was born to die poor, / with a tango between my lips and in a muddled game of cards. / I play, sing, drink, laugh… and even if I don’t have a penny left, / when the last hour strikes… let them take away what I dance!”

These lines encapsulate a declaration of acceptance and celebration of life on the speaker’s terms, challenging social norms that value the accumulation of material wealth as an indicator of success and fulfillment.

This passage reveals a deep resignation and yet joy in the lifestyle chosen by the speaker, one that prioritizes sensory and emotional experiences—dancing, music, games, singing—as sources of wisdom, over financial security (“I was born to die poor”), not only accepts but also embraces a life free from the constraints and worries that accompany material wealth, suggesting there are a much deeper richness life’s experiences and in personal authenticity.

The verse “I play, sing, drink, laugh… and even if I don’t have a penny left” reinforces the idea that true happiness, satisfaction, and wisdom come from living fully, joyfully, and without regrets, regardless of financial status. The closing phrase “let them take away what I dance,” is a popular saying meaning that no one can take away lived experiences, emphasizing that what we truly value at the end of our days are those moments lived and the knowledge we have bestowed, not the accumulated wealth.

These verses are a hymn to a life lived with authenticity and passion, a reminder that in the end, when “the last hour strikes,” what counts are the joys, experiences, and wisdom we have gathered, not the money. According to the speaker, life is to be lived fully and with a joyful acceptance of our fate, finding beauty and meaning in art, shared experiences, and the wisdom gained rather than in material wealth.

Each moment thus becomes fully justified.

We can die at peace with our desire, having found our answer to the question of how to live.

More articles about Argentine Tango

Continue learning Argentine Tango:

Leer este artículo en español

Continue reading

Argentine Tango today

Argentine Tango today

Argentine Tango mural in Buenos Aires today

I would like to comment on the situation of Tango today (April 2023).
Concerning music, the trend that began in the late 90s and early 2000s has been increasingly affirmed, in which young musicians have revalued the relevance of dance in Tango as a whole, investigating the principles that shape the way of playing the Tango of the Golden Age, the glorious decade of the 40s, leaving aside the lines traced by Ástor Piazzolla (see the documentary film “Si sos brujo”).

As for the dance, the following process can be observed:

1. Firstly, in the 1980s, there was a concern about the appropriate methodology to transmit the Tango dance to everyone who wanted to learn. Let us bear in mind that for the dancers who were trained before the eclipse of Tango (for which, in my opinion, it is pertinent to take the year 1955), the way of learning to dance was what can be called “homemade” or “organic”, that is to say, they did not have to look for Tango classes, but instead, they were born in a time and an environment in which it was natural and expected of them to dance Tango. Tango was not seen as a profession, although no less was demanded regarding the quality of dance. The first steps could be taken inside the home if the relatives already danced Tango and transmitted it to the new family members along with all the other things in the home, such as meals, schedules, beliefs, and values.

Alternatively, or in the case of starting at home, the next steps were taken not far away, with friends from the neighborhood, in the club, and in “prácticas”, which were places of research, creativity, and collective teaching, where everyone learned from everyone and those who stood out were those who could show more excellent dexterity, “mischief”, transmitted and inspired more positive emotions (love, joy, etc.) to the witnesses, who were none other than the same friends from the neighborhood who attended the same practices, or those who saw them in the neighborhood clubs once they began to participate in the milongas. Friendship, in this case, did not force them to a hypocritical acceptance and easy approval; on the contrary, it forced them to express their assessments without ambiguity, be it acceptance or rejection, which contributed to a general improvement of the dance level. In those times, there were “Tango teachers”, some more or less authentic than others, who taught the steps of Tango to those who did not belong to that more natural and homely circuit and had the purchasing power to pay for lessons. We can also find attempts (commercially successful but not in the results of good dancers), such as Domingo Gaeta, who, copying Arthur Murray from the United States, taught to dance the Tango by mail, sending pieces of paper with foot-prints drawn, so that the student would put them on the floor and step on them and thus learn the steps of Tango.

 
2. The first methodology that we can find at the beginning of the “renaissance” of Tango, from the return to democracy in Argentina in 1984, is the one that uses the so-called “basic step”. This method is related to the language used in the Golden Age to communicate the necessary knowledge to dance in a more or less rational way.
 
3. Then, a movement of young dancers emerged who rejected the hierarchy within the environments of the dancers who had learned in the golden age. For these dancers of the Golden Era, this hierarchy was based solely on the quality of their dance and their experience, regardless of their aesthetic choices, always emphasizing that “each dancer develops their unique style”. To dance in the milongas required a quality of dance and an experiential understanding of Tango that was very far from what the new dancers could possess and develop (let us take into account that this hiatus of almost 30 years that took place between 1955 and 1984 produced a great distance between knowledge and experience between old and new dancers). The younger and more determined new dancers, with values already different from that generation, decided to create their own spaces, methodology, and understanding of Tango, calling this movement “New Tango”. Who knew how to give a language to this new way of understanding Tango while maintaining a continuity with the Tango of the glorious era was Rodolfo Dinzel. For Dinzel, Tango as a dance was not just “steps” but history and all the conflicts that inhabit it (social, political-economic struggles, gender conflicts, etc.) that are embodied in the dancers and continue each time that they update a choreography that does not “is” but “becomes”. However, there are very few who understood the depth of Dinzel’s vision, and much less those who today recognize his influence, the methodology that he developed to be able to explain Tango to new generations of dancers, both from Rio de la Plata and from all over the world, forever modified the physical-spiritual language of Tango, updating its interpretation to a time very different from that of the 40s and 50s.
 
4. Other movements arose in response to the irruption of the new Tango. Among them, the “milonguero” style that has been associated with the person of Susana Miller, who claims to be the one who coined this name; the salon style, which was centered around a group of dancers who self-awarded the name “Villa Urquiza style” due to the geographical location of the dance halls they attended in the Buenos Aires neighborhood of the same name. Other styles can be mentioned, although the essential thing is to understand that in the glorious era of Tango, the style was something individual, and therefore, the most pertinent thing would be to make a list of outstanding dancers and couples, which I leave for another future article.
 
5. The appearance of the World Tango Championship, as an attempt, conscious or not, to maintain the relevance of Buenos Aires in a Tango that is an “intangible heritage of humanity” and its globalization, together with the faith in the economism of the predominant Anglo-Saxon culture that globalization has spread to all corners of the planet, generating two tendencies, to my understanding, equally superficial in terms of the way of assessing the significance of Tango: Tango as a profession, that is, as my grandmother Rita used to say “Por la plata baila el mono” (the monkey dances for money), in which the value of a dancer is discerned in economic terms or economic potential; hence the interest in winning a world championship is estimated in the economic benefits that this can yield in terms of publicity, prestige, and image. On the other hand, the mediocre and emotionless dance of those who dance “to distract themselves”, as a “hobby”, a superficial pastime, without caring about the quality of their dance (although there is no care for real emotions in the “professionals” either, besides acting as if they were feeling emotions while dancing for an audience). Let us remember here for a moment that those who learned to dance before the eclipse of Tango had no other interest than the personal satisfaction of being good dancers. Being good dancers coincided for them with a certain wisdom about life. Before, the objective of dancing well was to become “the king of cabaret”; today, it is a more abstract goal: to be a “world” champion. Before, a dancer was recognized spontaneously by his peers in his community; now, he needs to be approved by the “quality control” of the judges. The evaluation system of the first case is more intrinsic, organic, and homemade, more concrete and local. In the second case, it comes more from transcendent, universal abstractions. It cannot be separated from the conditions of world capitalism, that is, money and, more specifically, the dollar, which would be something like the world champion of currencies. This particular need to appear as the ideal of dancers before the most significant possible number of people (the entire world) produces a superficialization of Tango. It is necessary to appeal to an increasingly common denominator, that is, to vulgarize it, to spread it. Thus, the most intimate and profound elements of Tango are lost. It loses its modesty. It undresses, and therefore, he empties itself. The gestures are increasingly rehearsed and therefore lose spontaneity and honesty.

As for the poetry of Tango, it is absent in a world absent of poetry. In the words of my friend and teacher, the excellent dancer and milonguero Blas Catrenau: “What can poets write about today?” “My cell phone ran out of battery, and I can’t send you a WhatsApp?” 🤣

More articles about Argentine Tango

Continue learning Argentine Tango:

Leer este artículo en español

Marcelo Solis dancing Argentine Tango with Mimi

How to become a good dancer

–and keep getting better.

Find the answer

Anibal Troilo and his orchestra | Argentine Tango music to learn to dance

Argentine Tango music

Music to learn to dance

Listen and dance!

History of Argentine Tango: El Cachafaz and Carmencita Calderon at Tango (Movie 1933)

History of Argentine Tango

Tango is a culture

Learn more about Tango

History of Tango | Excerpt: Differences between “compadrito”, “guapo”, and “malevo”.

History of Tango | Excerpt: Differences between “compadrito”, “guapo”, and “malevo”.

Compadrito's knife of the history of Argentine Tango.

Wondering what was the difference between “compadrito”, “guapo”, and “malevo”? Adrián Rodriguez Yemha offers us the results of his research:

Compadrito:

Dancer by nature, kind, friendly, always working honestly, neat, romantic, carried a knife and knew how to handle it very well if necessary.

Guapo:

Knives’ man, neighborhood’ strong man, bodyguard of political leaders, they formed a family, many over time even ended up in an honest job.

Malevo: 

Pimp, ruffian, quarrelsome, of bad habits, treacherous, without any nobility, if he could stab in the back he did.

More about the History of Tango

Leer este artículo en español

History of Tango – Part 11: José Martínez. The great intuitive.

History of Tango – Part 11: José Martínez. The great intuitive.

José Martínez, Argentine Tango musician and composer.

(28 January 1890 – 27 July 1939)

He was a great pianist and composer who has left lasting tangos, in versions that we still listen to and like to dance, even though he did not know how to write music nor did he study it formally.
He was known in the Tango scene by the nickname of El Gallego (The Spaniard), to which he replied: «That’s whimsical, I’m from Buenos Aires. I have a Spanish surname but my parents, my grandparents, and great-grandparents were Argentines».

Without having studied music, he played by ear, and yet he was a very good instrumentalist and a better composer; as he did not know how to write them, his creations were put on paper by other musicians, among whom were Eduardo Arolas, Augusto Berto, Agustín Bardi, and Francisco Canaro.

He was greatly intuitive and learned to play the piano by watching his friends play.

He even left the music on several occasions to work as a salaryman in different companies, such as the cereal companies Bunge & Born, Dreyfus, and in a notary’s office.
 
His professional career began in 1911, with a trio formed with Augusto Berto on bandoneon and Julio Doutry on violin.
He used to invent the melody of his compositions by improvising during his concerts.

At one point he joined a group with Francisco Canaro, who brought his first work to paper: “Pura uva”:

Carnival at Teatro Colón, 1917. Poster.

Once he had gained experience, playing in cafeterias in La Boca, he was summoned by Eduardo Arolas to fill the place left vacant by none other than Agustín Bardi.

In this period, Arolas would be in charge of the transcription of his compositions.
 
In 1917, Francisco Canaro had achieved a great reputation in the milonguero scene, and his orchestra merged with Roberto Firpo‘s to perform at the carnivals at the Teatro Colón of Rosario city.

Musicians such as Eduardo Arolas, Osvaldo Fresedo, Bachicha Deambroggio, Tito Roccatagliata, Pedro Polito, Agesilao Ferrazzano, Julio Doutry, Leopoldo Thompson, Alejandro Michetti, make up this group.

The pianists were Firpo himself and José Martínez.
In 1918 Osvaldo Fresedo, left the Canaro orchestra to form his own group and play at the Pigall Casino. Shortly after, Martínez is the one who became independent to form his own orchestra that would play at the L’Abbaye cabaret, on Esmeralda Street. Canaro himself confessed some time after that, he thought, it would greatly weaken his orchestra:
 
“Bandoneonists were scarce and I turned to Minotto Di Cicco, who worked in Montevideo. And since he had nothing to envy Fresedo, he prevailed shortly after…
The problem came when José Martínez decided to form his own orchestra to premiere with it at the cabaret L’Abbaye, at Esmeralda Street. That was a regrettable casualty!

I supplanted him with Luis Riccardi, a pianist with a good technique… and I had to put up with the complaints from Royal’s clientele. They noticed the change and missed the typical Martínez beat. It took me a lot to convince the clientele of the cabaret!”

Carlos Gardel, Argentine Tango singer with his racehorse.

Martínez also spent time playing with several successful theater companies, and in one of them, “El Gran Premio Nacional”, he would premiere his beautiful tango “Polvorín”, dedicated to a racehorse, with lyrics by Manuel Romero, recorded by Carlos Gardel in 1922.

Gardel would also record his “De vuelta al bulín”, with lyrics by Pascual Contursi.

In 1918, together with Francisco Canaro, Vicente Greco, Rafael Tuegols, Luis Teisseire, and Samuel Castriota, he was part of the group that met in a basement in Florida at 300 to shape an organization that would defend their rights and in 1920 he became part of the first board of directors of the entity that with time would become the current SADAIC.

At the end of 1928, he retired from the musical activity.

He would die at the age of 49, but he left us a series of tangos that enrich the floors of the milongas with their beauty.

Let’s listen to some that are very familiar to us:

“Pablo” Dedicated to Pablo Podestá.

By Anibal Troilo y su Orquesta Típica, 1943.

More about this song
“Canaro” Dedicated to Francisco Canaro

By Juan D’Arienzo y su Orquesta Típica, 1941.

More about this song
“El pensamiento”

By Juan D’Arienzo y su Orquesta Típica, 1945.

More about this song
“Punto y coma”

By Osvaldo Pugliese y su Orquesta Típica, 1948.

More about this song
“El cencerro”

By Juan D’Arienzo y su Orquesta Típica, 1937.

More about this song
'La torcasita', Argentine Tango music sheet cover. “La torcacita”

By Carlos Di Sarli y su Orquesta Típica, 1941.

More about this song
“Olivero”

By Osvaldo Pugliese y su Orquesta Típica, 1951.

More about this song